View source for Question: Is the representation of Min actually Egyptian "pornography"?

{{Main Page}}
<onlyinclude>
==Question: Is the representation of Min actually Egyptian "pornography"?==
===This attitude demonstrates not only an immaturity about sexuality, but it also a misunderstanding of ancient Egyptian religion===

To answer this question about Facsimile 2 figure 7, the first thing we need to disabuse is that it constitutes "pornography" because it shows the deity with an erect phallus. This attitude demonstrates not only an immaturity about sexuality, but it also a misunderstanding of ancient Egyptian religion. The characterization of this as "pornography" is grossly inappropriate. The Egyptians would almost certainly have not conceived of this figure on the hypocephalus as "pornographic" in the way most people understand the word. This attitude reflected by some is a good example of how our modern, sexually-obsessed society can easily misinterpret religious art. We see an erect penis in a drawing and think "pornography," whereas an ancient Egyptian would have seen one and thought of fertility, virility and life. Hence the depiction of Min with an erection was a sign of his life-giving ability. We have analogies in Northwest Semitic depictions of God. (El is both called and depicted as a virile bull in the Ugaritic texts, both because of his procreative powers and his greatness over the other gods.) 

Another thing to keep in mind is just how common syncretism of religious ideas and iconography was between Near Eastern cultures. We know ancient Hebrews and other Near Eastern people used a phallic God to depict “the God of the Bible” all the time. The Canaanite god Baal, for example, shares the same epithet with Yahweh ("cloud rider") in Psalm 68:4.
</onlyinclude>
{{endnotes sources}}
[[Category:Letter to a CES Director]]

[[es:Pregunta: Es la representación de Min realidad "pornografía" egipcia?]]
[[pt:Pergunta: É a representação de Min realmente egípcio "pornografia"?]]
[[Category:Questions]]