View source for Kinderhook Plates

{{Main Page}}
{{Navigation:Joseph Smith}}{{blankline}}
{{Navigation:Latter-day Saint history}}{{blankline}}

=What are the Kinderhook Plates?=
{{BMCentral|title=What Do the Kinderhook Plates Reveal About Joseph Smith’s Gift of Translation?|url=https://knowhy.bookofmormoncentral.org/knowhy/what-do-the-kinderhook-plates-reveal-about-joseph-smiths-gift-of-translation|number=454}}
==The Kinderhook Plates are a forged set of metal plates that were given to Joseph Smith to translate==
[[Image:KinderhookPlates.jpg|frame|right|Image of front and back of four of the six Kinderhook plates are shown in these facsimiles (rough copies of even earlier published facsimiles), which appeared in 1909 in {{HC|vol=5|start=374|end=375}}]]

A set of small plates, engraved with characters of ancient appearance, were purported to have been unearthed in Kinderhook, Illinois, in April 1843.  The so-called "Kinderhook plates" have been something of an enigma within the Mormon community since they first appeared.  While there are faithful LDS who take a number of different positions on the topic of these artifacts, most have concluded that they were fakes.

Joseph Smith appears to have had the plates in his possession for about five days.

Joseph Smith's personal secretary, William Clayton said,
<blockquote>
President Joseph has translated a portion [of the Kinderhook plates], and says they contain the history of the person with whom they were found; and he was a descendant of Ham, through the loins of Pharaoh, King of Egypt, and that he received his kingdom through the ruler of heaven and earth.
</blockquote>
Chemical analysis performed by the Chicago Historical Society on one of the plates in 1981 showed that the plates were fake.<ref>Stanley B. Kimball, "[https://www.churchofjesuschrist.org/study/ensign/1981/08/kinderhook-plates-brought-to-joseph-smith-appear-to-be-a-nineteenth-century-hoax?lang=eng Kinderhook Plates Brought to Joseph Smith Appear to be a Nineteenth Century Hoax]," ''Ensign'' 11 (August 1981).</ref> Before the release of the CHS' analysis, criticism of the episode from those outside of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints was infrequent.<ref>Notable works that mentioned it are William Alexander Linn, ''The Story of the Mormons: From the Date of Their Origin to the Year 1901'' (New York: Macmillan, 1902) and Jerald and Sandra Tanner, ''Archaeology and the Book of Mormon'' (Salt Lake City: Modern Microlm, 1969).</ref> After the release, criticism became much more frequent.<ref>Edward J. Decker and Dave Hunt,  ''The God Makers: A Shocking Exposé of What the Mormon Church Really Believes'' (Eugene, OR: Harvest, 1984), 99&ndash;115; Jerald and Sandra Tanner, ''Mormonism: Shadow or Reality?'', 4th ed.(Salt Lake City: Utah Lighthouse Ministry, 1987); John Ahmanson, “The Book of Mormon," ''Ahmanson’s Secret History: A Translation of Vor Tids Muhamed'', trns. Gleason L. Archer, (Chicago, IL: Moody Press, 1984), 75&ndash;102; Grant H. Palmer, ''An Insider's View of Mormon Origins'' (Salt Lake City: Signature Books, 2002), 30&ndash;34, 259; Jeremy T. Runnells, ''CES Letter: My Search for Answers to My Mormon Doubts'' (American Fork, UT: CES Letter Foundation, 2017), 77&ndash;80.</ref> All critics have believed that this episode brings into question any claim of "inspiration" that Joseph used to translate the Kinderhook Plates and by extension any other revelations he received.

==Joseph Smith "translated" a portion of those plates, not by claiming inspiration, but by comparing characters on the plates to those on his "Grammar and Alphabet of the Egyptian Language" (GAEL)==

However, Joseph Smith "translated" a portion of those plates, not by claiming inspiration, but by comparing characters on the plates to those on his "Grammar and Alphabet of the Egyptian Language" (GAEL). (The GAEL was composed in Kirtland about the time of the translation of the Book of Abraham.) Joseph found one of the most prominent characters on the plates to match a character on the second page of characters in the GAEL. Both were boat shaped. The GAEL interpretation of this boat-shaped character included everything that William Clayton said Joseph said.

Corroborating this is a letter in the ''New York Herald'' for May 30th, 1843, from someone who signed pseudonymously as "A Gentile." Research shows "A Gentile" to be a friendly non-Mormon then living in Nauvoo by the name of Sylvester Emmons.<ref>Don Bradley and Mark Ashurst-McGee, “‘President Joseph Has Translated a Portion’: Joseph Smith and the Mistranslation of the Kinderhook Plates,” ''Producing Ancient Scripture: Joseph Smith's Translation Projects in the Development of Mormon Christianity'', eds. Michael Hubbard McKay, Mark Ashurst-McGee, and Brian M. Hauglid (Salt Lake City: University of Utah Press, 2020), 499&ndash;502.</ref> He wrote:
<blockquote>
The plates are evidently brass, and are covered on both sides with hieroglyphics. They were brought up and shown to Joseph Smith.  He compared them, in my presence, with his Egyptian Alphabet…and they are evidently the same characters.  He therefore will be able to decipher them.
</blockquote>
We know that Joseph was interested in languages.  He studied Greek, Hebrew, and German in a secular manner.  Therefore, we can easily believe that he attempted to translate the Kinderhook plates without assuming prophetic powers, which powers consequently remain credible.

=There are 11 important documents to deal with when dealing with the Kinderhook Plates. This article examines all of them.=

There exist several accounts that describe the plates. Not all of the account agree on the details.

==William Clayton 1 May 1843==
<blockquote>
I have seen 6 brass plates which were found in Adams County by some persons who were digging in a mound. They found a skeleton about 6 feet from the surface of the earth which was 9 foot high. [At this point there is a tracing of a plate in the journal.] The plates were on the breast of the skeleton. This diagram shows the size of the plates being drawn on the edge of one of them. They are covered with ancient characters of language containing from 30 to 40 on each side of the plates. Prest J. has translated a portion and says they contain the history of the person with whom they were found and he was a descendant of Ham through the loins of Pharoah king of Egypt, and that he received his kingdom from the ruler of heaven and earth. <ref>William Clayton Diary, 1 May 1843.  Printed in {{IntimateChronicle1|start=100}}</ref>
</blockquote>

==Charlotte Haven 2 May 1843==
Charlotte Haven claimed to have heard from a friend that Joseph:

<blockquote>said that the figures or writing on them was similar to that in which the Book of Mormon was written...thought that by the help of revelation he would be able to translate them. So a sequel to that holy book may soon be expected.<ref>Charlotte Haven, "A Girl’s Letters from Nauvoo," ''Overland Monthly'' 16, no. 96, December 1890, 630; letter written May 2, 1843.</ref></blockquote>

==Brigham Young 3 May 1843==
Brigham Young also drew an outline of one of the Kinderhook plates in a small notebook/diary that he kept. Inside the drawing he wrote: 
<blockquote>May 3—1843. I had this at Joseph Smith’s house. Found near Quincy.<ref>L. Tom Perry Special Collections, Brigham Young University</ref></blockquote>

==The ''Quincy Whig'' 3 May 1843==
The Quincy Whig (a newspaper from a local town near Kinderhook) published their reaction to the plates. It reads:

<blockquote>Finally, a company of ten or twelve repaired to the mound, and assisted in digging out the shaft commenced by Wiley. After penetrating the mound about 11 feet, they came to a bed of limestone, that had apparently been subjected to the action of fire, they removed the stone, which were small and easy to handle, to the depth of two feet more, when they found SIX BRASS PLATES, secured and fastened together by two iron wires, but which were so decayed, that they readily crumbled to dust upon being handled. The plates were so completely covered with rust as almost to obliterate the characters inscribed upon them; but after undergoing a chemical process, the inscriptions were brought out plain and distinct... <ref>''Quincy Whig'' Wednesday, 3 May 1842.</ref></blockquote>

==''Times and Seasons'' Editorial 3 or 4 of May 1843==
<blockquote>Mr. Smith has had those plates, what his opinion concerning them is, we have not yet ascertained. The gentleman that owns them has taken them away, or we should have given a fac simile of the plates and characters in this number. We are informed however, that he purposes returning with them for translation; if so, we may be able yet to furnish our readers with it.</blockquote>

==Joseph Smith Journal 7 May 1843==
Joseph Smith's journal entry for 7 May 1843 reads:
<blockquote>
May 7[th] Sunday 1843. forenoon visited by several gentlemen concerning the plates which were dug out of a mound near quncy [Quincy] sent by Wm Smith to the office for Hebrew Bible & Lexicon—
Mr Vickers the wire dancer called. A.M.— court of 1st Preside[n]cy met & adjond [adjourned] one week, 2 P.P. [p.m.]
399President not well— councellors acted.—
evening preaching by Elder [Orson] Hyde text Luke 21 chapter.<ref>"Journal, December 1842–June 1844; Book 2, 10 March 1843–14 July 1843," p. [195], ''The Joseph Smith Papers'', accessed July 30, 2019, https://www.josephsmithpapers.org/paper-summary/journal-december-1842-june-1844-book-2-10-march-1843-14-july-1843/203</ref></blockquote>

==Parley P. Pratt's account 7 May 1843==
Parley P. Pratt's account conflicts with Clayton's in some regards:

<blockquote>Six plates having the appearance of Brass have lately been dug out of a mound by a gentleman in Pike Co. Illinois. They are small and filled with engravings in Egyptian language and contain the genealogy of one of the ancient Jaredites back to Ham the son of Noah. His bones were found in the same vase (made of Cement). Part of the bones were 15 ft. underground. ... A large number of Citizens have seen them and compared the characters with those on the Egyptian papyrus which is now in this city. <ref>Parley P. Pratt letter to John Van Cott, Sunday, 7 May 1843, original in John Van Cott correspondence, Church Archives.</ref></blockquote>

'''Comparison of Clayton and Pratt Accounts of Kinderhook Plates'''
{| valign="top" border="1" style="width:100%"
!Story Element!!Clayton Account!!Clayton Correct?!!Pratt Account!!Pratt Correct?
|-
|Skeleton||Yes||Incorrect||Yes||Incorrect
|-
|Size skeleton||9 feet||Incorrect||Normal size||Incorrect
|-
|Depth buried||6 feet||Incorrect||15 feet||Incorrect
|-
|Location plates||On breast of skeleton||Incorrect||No mention||N/A
|-
|Dig site||Adams county||Incorrect||Pike county||Correct
|-
|Cement vase||No mention||Correct||Mention||Incorrect
|}

==John Taylor and Wilford Woodruff broadside 24 June 1843==
<blockquote>The contents of the Plates, together with a Fac-simile of the same, will be published in the ‘Times & Seasons,’ as soon as the translation is completed.<ref>See "A Brief Account of the Discovery of the Brass Plates Recently Taken from a Mound near Kinderhook, Pike County, Illinois," (Taylor & Woodruff, June 24, 1843).</ref></blockquote>

==Wilbur Fugate 30 June 1879==
Wilbur Fugate, one of the perpetrator's of the hoax, wrote a few decades later:

<blockquote>Our plans worked admirably. A certain Sunday was appointed for the digging. The night before, Wiley went to the Mound where he had previously dug to the depth of about eight feet, there being a flat rock that sounded hollow beneath, and put them under it. On the following morning quite a number of citizens were there to assist in the search, there being two Mormon elders present (Marsh and Sharp). The rock was soon removed but some time elapsed before the plates were discovered. I finally picked them up and exclaimed, 'A piece of pot metal!' Fayette Grubb snatched them from me and struck them against the rock and they fell to pieces. Dr. Harris examined them and said they had hieroglyphics on them. He took acid and removed the rust and they were soon out on exhibition.

Under this rock (which) was dome-like in appearance (and) about three feet in diameter, there were a few bones in the last stage of decomposition, also a few pieces of pottery and charcoal. There was no skeleton found. <ref>W. Fugate to Mr. Cobb, 30 June 1879, Mound Station, Illinois and Fugate affidavit of same date; cited in Welby W. Ricks, "The Kinderhook Plates," reprinted from ''Improvement Era'' (September 1962).</ref></blockquote>

Later he declared in affidavit:
<blockquote>Those plates are a HUMBUG, gotten up by Robert Wiley, Bridge Whitton and myself. … None of the nine persons who signed the certificate knew the secret, except Wiley and I.

We read in Pratt’s prophecy that ‘Truth is yet to spring out of the earth.’ [The quote is from Parley P. Pratt’s 1837 missionary tract ''Voice of Warning''.] We concluded to prove the prophecy by way of a joke. We soon made our plans and executed them. Bridge Whitton cut them out of some pieces of copper; Wiley and I made the hieroglyphics by making impressions on beeswax and filling them with acid and putting it on the plates. When they were finished we put them together with rust made of nitric acid, old iron and lead, and bound them with a piece of hoop iron, covering them completely with the rust.<ref>W. Fugate to Mr. Cobb, 30 June 1879, Mound Station, Illinois and Fugate affidavit of same date</ref></blockquote>

==Stanley Kimball Article (Ensign, Aug 1981)==

Stanley Kimball published findings demonstrating the plates a hoax:

<blockquote>A recent electronic and chemical analysis of a metal plate (one of six original plates) brought in 1843 to the Prophet Joseph Smith in Nauvoo, Illinois, appears to solve a previously unanswered question in Church history, helping to further evidence that the plate is what its producers later said it was—a nineteenth-century attempt to lure Joseph Smith into making a translation of ancient-looking characters that had been etched into the plates.<ref>Stanley Kimball, "[https://www.churchofjesuschrist.org/study/ensign/1981/08/kinderhook-plates-brought-to-joseph-smith-appear-to-be-a-nineteenth-century-hoax?lang=eng Kinderhook Plates Brought to Joseph Smith Appear to be Nineteenth Century Hoax]," ''Ensign'' 10 (August 1980).</ref></blockquote>

=Why does ''History of the Church'' say that Joseph Smith said "I have translated a portion of them..."?=
[[File:Mormoninfographic.kinderhook.clayton.jpg|500 px|thumb|right|This shows the hostile "Mormoninfographic" that is accurate, but will still probably misread readers because it doesn't explain the whole story.]]
==''History of the Church'' was written by others in the "first person," as if Joseph wrote it himself==

The following is from Stanley B. Kimball, "Kinderhook Plates Brought to Joseph Smith Appear to Be a Nineteenth-Century Hoax," ''Ensign'', August 1981 {{link|url=http://www.lds.org/ensign/1981/08/kinderhook-plates-brought-to-joseph-smith-appear-to-be-a-nineteenth-century-hoax?lang=eng}}
<blockquote>
These two oblique references to a “translation” were followed thirteen years later by a more direct published statement that <span style="color:blue">until recently was wrongly thought to have been written by Joseph Smith himself.</span> On September 3 and 10, 1856, the following paragraphs appeared in the Deseret News as part of the serialized “History of Joseph Smith”:
<br><br>
“[May 1, 1843:] I insert fac similes of the six brass plates found near Kinderhook, in Pike county, Illinois, on April 23, by Mr. R. Wiley and others, while excavating a large mound. They found a skeleton about six feet from the surface of the earth, which must have stood nine feet high. The plates were found on the breast of the skeleton, and were covered on both sides with ancient characters.
<br><br>
<span style="color:blue">“I have translated a portion of them, and find they contain the history of the person with whom they were found. He was a descendant of Ham, through the loins of Pharaoh, king of Egypt, and that he received his kingdom from the ruler of heaven and earth.”</span> (Then followed a reprint of material from the Times and Seasons article.)
<br><br>
<span style="color:blue">Although this account appears to be the writing of Joseph Smith, it is actually an excerpt from a journal of William Clayton.</span> It has been well known that the serialized “History of Joseph Smith” consists largely of items from other persons’ personal journals and other sources, collected during Joseph Smith’s lifetime and continued after the Saints were in Utah, then edited and pieced together to form a history of the Prophet’s life “in his own words.” It was not uncommon in the nineteenth century for biographers to put the narrative in the first person when compiling a biographical work, even though the subject of the biography did not actually say or write all the words attributed to him; thus the narrative would represent a faithful report of what others felt would be helpful to print. The Clayton journal excerpt was one item used in this way. <span style="color:blue">For example, the words “I have translated a portion” originally read “President J. has translated a portion. …”</span>
</blockquote>

=Did Joseph Smith attempt to translate the Kinderhook Plates?=
[[File:Kinderhook.plates.don.bradley.description.jpg|right|500 px|thumb|This data was introduced by {{Bradley:President Joseph Has Translated a Portion:2011 FAIR Conference}}]]
==Joseph Smith attempted to translate a character on the Kinderhood Plates by matching it to his "Grammar and Alphabet of the Egyptian Language (GAEL)"==

Don Bradley presented compelling evidence during his 2011 FAIR Conference presentation that Joseph Smith did indeed attempt to translate a character on the Kinderhook Plates.<ref>Don Bradley, "[http://www.fairmormon.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/Don-Bradley-Kinderhook-President-Joseph-Has-Translated-a-Portion-1.pdf President Joseph Has Translated a Portion': Solving the Mystery of the Kinderhook Plates]," ''FAIR Conference'' 2011.</ref> Bradley noted that William Clayton's account is likely representing personal and specific knowledge acquired from Joseph Smith, since evidence indicates that he made his journal entries that day while he was at the Prophet's home. Clayton's account states that 

<blockquote>
Prest J. has translated a portion and says they contain the history of the person with whom they were found and he was a descendant of Ham through the loins of Pharoah king of Egypt, and that he received his kingdom from the ruler of heaven and earth.
</blockquote>

Bradley noted that one of the most prominent characters on the Kinderhook Plates (a symbol shaped like a boat), when broken down into its individual elements matched a symbol found on page 4 (the second page of characters) of the Grammar and Alphabet of the Egyptian Language (GAEL), often referred to as the "Egyptian Alphabet. The GAEL provides meanings for the individual symbols, and the meaning assigned to the particular symbol found on the plates supports the translation reported to have been provided by Joseph.

The conclusion is that Clayton's account appears to be accurate, that Joseph did attempt to translate "a portion" of them by non-revelatory means, and the translation provided matches a corresponding symbol and explanation in the GAEL.

*As William Clayton noted in his journal, Joseph "translated a portion" of the Kinderhook plates. Joseph attempted to translate one of the characters on the plates by matching it to a similar character on the Grammar and Alphabet of the Egyptian Language (GAEL), a document that was produced in the same timeframe as the Book of Abraham. It is from the GAEL that he derived the "descendant of Ham, through the loins of Pharaoh" meaning.


=Did Joseph attempt to translate the Kinderhook Plates using the "gift and power of God?"=
[[File:Mormoninfographic.kinderhook.josephs.gift.jpg|500 px|thumb|right|This shows the hostile "Mormoninfographic" that tells part of the story, but will still probably misread readers.]]
==Joseph apparently did not attempt to translate by the "gift and power of God". Joseph never translated more than the single character==

At the time that Joseph Smith translated the Book of Mormon, he only claimed the ability to translate by the "gift and power of God." Over time, Joseph studied other languages and wished to learn to translate by other means. His attempt to use the Grammar and Alphabet of the Egyptian Language (a document that he and others had created) to attempt a translation of the Kinderhook Plates fits in with this desire. Since only a single character "matched," Joseph would have been unable to continue to translate the plates in this manner. This may explain why such a translation was never produced: beyond the single character which happened to match, it would not have even been possible to translate the fraudulent plates either manually or by the "gift and power of God." Therefore, no translation was ever produced.

=What does Joseph's attempt to translate the Kinderhook Plates tell us about his "gift of translation?"=
==Joseph's attempt to translate manually tells us that he didn't attempt to translate the plates using the "gift and power of God"==

A critical graphic from "mormoninfographics" states that "Joseph didn't discern the fraud. The LDS Church now concedes it's a hoax. What does this tell us about Joseph Smith's gift of translation?"

Simply put, Joseph's attempt to translate the plates manually tells us that he didn't attempt to translate the plates using the "gift and power of God."

=Why is the statement of William Clayton regarding the Kinderhook Plates in ''History of the Church'' written as if Joseph Smith himself said it?=
==''History of the Church'' was written in the "first person" after Joseph's death==

It should be noted that the critical "mormoninfographic" includes a portion of a quote from ''History of the Church'' that is written as if it came from Joseph Smith. 

The graphic is correct, but it is useful to know the actual source of the quote used by ''History of the Church.'':
<blockquote>
<span style="color:blue">I insert fac-similes of the six brass plates found near Kinderhook,</span> in Pike county, Illinois, on April 23, by Mr. Robert Wiley and others, while excavating a large mound. They found a skeleton about six feet from the surface of the earth, which must have stood nine feet high. The plates were found on the breast of the skeleton and were covered on both sides with ancient characters. <span style="color:blue">I have translated a portion of them, and find they contain the history of the person with whom they were found. He was a descendant of Ham, through the loins of Pharaoh, king of Egypt, and that he received his kingdom from the Ruler of heaven and earth.</span>
</blockquote>

The quote in question was written in William Clayton's journal. It was rewritten in the first person (as if Joseph Smith had said it himself) when it was included in ''History of the Church''. Clayton's journal is the primary source, which was used in ''History of the Church'' (a secondary source). 

The quote by William Clayton is indeed accurate: Joseph Smith ''did'' attempt to translate a portion of the Kinderhook Plates. This is explained in the following section.

The following is from Stanley B. Kimball, "Kinderhook Plates Brought to Joseph Smith Appear to Be a Nineteenth-Century Hoax," ''Ensign'', August 1981 {{link|url=http://www.lds.org/ensign/1981/08/kinderhook-plates-brought-to-joseph-smith-appear-to-be-a-nineteenth-century-hoax?lang=eng}}
<blockquote>
These two oblique references to a “translation” were followed thirteen years later by a more direct published statement that <span style="color:blue">until recently was wrongly thought to have been written by Joseph Smith himself.</span> On September 3 and 10, 1856, the following paragraphs appeared in the Deseret News as part of the serialized “History of Joseph Smith”:
<br><br>
“[May 1, 1843:] I insert fac similes of the six brass plates found near Kinderhook, in Pike county, Illinois, on April 23, by Mr. R. Wiley and others, while excavating a large mound. They found a skeleton about six feet from the surface of the earth, which must have stood nine feet high. The plates were found on the breast of the skeleton, and were covered on both sides with ancient characters.
<br><br>
<span style="color:blue">“I have translated a portion of them, and find they contain the history of the person with whom they were found. He was a descendant of Ham, through the loins of Pharaoh, king of Egypt, and that he received his kingdom from the ruler of heaven and earth.”</span> (Then followed a reprint of material from the Times and Seasons article.)
<br><br>
<span style="color:blue">Although this account appears to be the writing of Joseph Smith, it is actually an excerpt from a journal of William Clayton.</span> It has been well known that the serialized “History of Joseph Smith” consists largely of items from other persons’ personal journals and other sources, collected during Joseph Smith’s lifetime and continued after the Saints were in Utah, then edited and pieced together to form a history of the Prophet’s life “in his own words.” It was not uncommon in the nineteenth century for biographers to put the narrative in the first person when compiling a biographical work, even though the subject of the biography did not actually say or write all the words attributed to him; thus the narrative would represent a faithful report of what others felt would be helpful to print. The Clayton journal excerpt was one item used in this way. <span style="color:blue">For example, the words “I have translated a portion” originally read “President J. has translated a portion. …”</span>
</blockquote>

{{SummaryItem
|link=Forgeries related to Mormonism/Joseph Smith and the Kinderhook Plates/Could the "Egyptian Alphabet" have been the Anthon transcript
|subject=Could the "Egyptian Alphabet" used in an attempt to translate the Kinderhook plates have actually been the Anthon transcript?
|summary=A non-Mormon made the following statement regarding the Kinderhook Plates: ""They were brought up and shown to Joseph Smith. He compared them in my presence with his Egyptian alphabet, which he took from the plates from which the Book of Mormon was translated..." Why does the non-Mormon eyewitness say that the "Egyptian Alphabet" was "from the plates which the Book of Mormon was translated?"
}}

{{PerspectivesBar
|link=http://www.fairmormon.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/Don-Bradley-Kinderhook-President-Joseph-Has-Translated-a-Portion-1.pdf
|title=‘President Joseph Has Translated a Portion’: Solving the Mystery of the Kinderhook Plates
|author=Don Bradley
|authorlink=http://www.fairmormon.org/perspectives/authors/bradley-don
|authorphoto=BradleyDon.png
|publication=Proceedings of the 2011 FAIR Conference
|date=August 2011
|summary=So, a larger conclusion that we can draw is that we’ve got both the smoking-gun – the GAEL that he uses to translate, and we’ve got an eyewitness. We know exactly how Joseph Smith attempted to translate from the Kinderhook plates and obtain the content that Clayton says he did. A larger conclusion, then, that we can draw is that Joseph Smith translated from the Kinderhook plates not by revelation, but by non-revelatory means. 
}}

{{To learn more box:Kinderhook plates}}{{blankline}}

{{Critical sources box:Forgeries related to Mormonism/Joseph Smith and the Kinderhook Plates/CriticalSources}}{{blankline}}
{{endnotes sources}}

<!-- PLEASE DO NOT REMOVE ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE -->
[[Category:An Insider's View of Mormon Origins]]
[[Category:John Dehlin's "Questions and Answers"]]
[[Category:Letter to a CES Director]]
[[Category:MormonThink]]
[[Category:No Man Knows My History]]
[[Category:Questions]]
[[es:Pregunta: ¿Cuáles son las planchas de Kinderhook?]]
[[es:Pregunta: ¿José Smith intenta traducir las planchas de Kinderhook?]]
[[es:Pregunta: ¿José intenta traducir las planchas de Kinderhook utilizando el "don y el poder de Dios"?]]
[[es:Pregunta: ¿Por qué ''Historia de la Iglesia'' dicen que José Smith dijo que "he traducido una parte de ellos ..."?]]
[[es:Pregunta: ¿Por qué es la declaración de '' La historia de la Iglesia '', escrito como si José dijo?]]
[[es:Pregunta: ¿Qué hace el intento de José para traducir las planchas de Kinderhook nos hablan de su "don de la traducción"?]]
[[pt:Pergunta: Joseph Smith tentou traduzir as placas de Kinderhook?]]
[[pt:Pergunta: Joseph tentou traduzir as placas de Kinderhook usando o “dom e poder de Deus?"]]
[[pt:Pergunta: O que a tentativa de Joseph de traduzir as placas de Kinderhook nos diz sobre seu “dom de tradução”?]]
[[pt:Pergunta: Por que o History of the Church afirma ter Joseph Smith dito "eu traduzi uma parte delas..."]]
[[pt:Pergunta: o que são as Placas Kinderhook?]]
[[pt:Pergunta: por que a declaração no ''History of the Church'' foi escrita como se Joseph a tivesse proferido?]]
[[de:Mormonismus betreffende Fälschungen/Kinderhook Platten]]
[[es:Falsificaciones relacionados con el Mormonismo/José Smith y las Planchas de Kinderhook]]
[[es:Falsificaciones relacionados con el Mormonismo/José Smith y las Planchas de Kinderhook]]
[[pt:Falsificações Relacionadas ao Mormonismo/Joseph Smith e as placas de Kinderhook]]
[[Category:John Dehlin's "Questions and Answers"]]