View source for Joseph Smith's alleged narcissism

{{Main Page}}
{{Navigation:Joseph Smith}}{{blankline}}


=Was Joseph Smith ego-maniacal, proud, and narcissistic?=
Joseph Smith is quoted as saying such things as:
* "I am learned, and know more than all the world put together."
* "I combat the errors of ages; I meet the violence of mobs; I cope with illegal proceedings from executive authority; I cut the Gordian knot of powers, and I solve mathematical problems of universities, with truth . . . diamond truth; and God is my ‘right hand man.’"

These quotes are used to portray Joseph as ego-maniacal, proud, and narcissistic.

To paraphrase G. D. Smith, small wonder, then, that this Joseph—the one revealed by the documents—decided to run for the presidency. The decision was natural since the Saints felt no candidate was worthy of their support—though they knew that a vote for Joseph could well be "throw[ing] away our votes."<ref>{{TS|article=Who Shall Be Our Next President|vol=5|num=4|date=15 February 1844|pages=441}}</ref>  Joseph’s campaign was "a gesture," though one he took seriously.<ref>{{RSR|512-517}}</ref>  Experienced students of Mormon history will know this; G. D. Smith evidently counts on his audience not knowing.

G. D. Smith writes that "in defending his theology [during the King Follett discourse], Smith proclaimed, ‘I am learned, and know more than all the world put together.’" The period ending the sentence would imply that this completed his thought—and so it appears in the ''History of the Church''.<ref>{{CriticalWork:Smith:Nauvoo Polygamy|pages=226}}</ref> If the three published versions of the original talk are consulted,<ref>{{Book:Smith:Essential Joseph Smith|pages=238}} {{TS|author=Joseph Smith|article=Conference Minutes|vol=15|num=5|date=15 August 1844|pages=614–15}} {{BYUS1|author=Stan Larson, ed.|article=[https://byustudies.byu.edu/showtitle.aspx?title=5321 The King Follett Discourse: A Newly Amalgamated Text]|vol=18|num=2|date=Winter 1978|pages=193–208}}.</ref> However, they each demonstrate that the sentiment may have been quite different:
<blockquote>
Now, I ask all the learned men who hear me, why the learned doctors who are preaching salvation say that God created the heavens and the earth out of nothing. They account it blasphemy to contradict the idea. ''If you tell them that God made the world out of something'', they will call you a fool. The reason is that they are unlearned but I ''am learned and'' know more than all the world put together—''the Holy Ghost does, anyhow''. If the Holy Ghost in me comprehends more than all the world, I will associate ''myself'' with it.<ref>Larson, "Newly Amalgamated Text," 203. The italic type (added by Larson) indicates material found only in Wilford Woodruff’s account.</ref>
</blockquote>

In the ''History of the Church'' version, the statement about the Holy Ghost is placed in its own sentence. This allows G. D. Smith to exclude it with no ellipsis and portray Joseph as decidedly more arrogant than he was. Daniel C. Peterson’s remark is telling: "Amusing, isn’t it, . . . that the very same people who vehemently reject the . . . ''History of the Church'' as an unreliable source when it seems to support the Latter-day Saint position clutch it to their bosoms as an unparalleled historical treasure when they think they can use it as a weapon against the alleged errors of Mormonism."<ref>{{FR-7-2-5}}</ref>{{Rp|54–55}}

==Letter taken from context==
Critics fail, then,  to provide the context for these remarks, some of which are taken from an exchange which Joseph had with newspaperman James Arlington Bennet.<ref>Bennet’s name is also sometimes spelled ''Bennett.''</ref>  For example, G.D. Smith quotes the phrases above and then editorializes: "With such a self-image, it is not surprising that he also aspired to the highest office in the land: the presidency of the United States."<ref>Smith, ''Nauvoo Polygamy, 225.</ref> Here again, he serves his readers poorly. He neglects to tell us that Joseph’s remark comes from a somewhat tongue-in-cheek exchange with James Bennet, who had been baptized in the East but immediately wrote Joseph to disclaim his "glorious frolic in the clear blue ocean; for most assuredly a frolic it was, without a moment’s reflection or consideration."<ref name="hc6">{{HoC1|vol=6}}</ref>{{Rp|71}}

==James Bennet's original letter==
Bennet went on to praise Joseph in an exaggerated, humorous style: "As you have proved yourself to be a philosophical divine . . . [it] point[s] you out as the most extraordinary man of the present age." "But," cautioned Bennet,
<blockquote>
my mind is of so mathematical and philosophical a cast, that the divinity of Moses makes no impression on me, and you will not be offended when I say that I rate you higher as a legislator than I do Moses. . . . I cannot, however, say but you are both right, it being out of the power of man to prove you wrong. It is no mathematical problem, and can therefore get no mathematical solution {{ia}}<ref name="hc6" />{{Rp|72}}
</blockquote>

Joseph’s claim that his religious witness can "solve mathematical problems of universities" is thus a playful return shot at Bennet,<ref>Charles Mackay, though mistaking this Bennet for John C. Bennett, nevertheless realized what was going on: "‘Joseph’s reply to this singular and too candid epistle was quite as singular and infinitely more amusing. Joseph was too cunning a man to accept, in plain terms, the rude but serviceable offer; and he rebuked the vanity and presumption of Mr Bennett, while dexterously retaining him for future use." See Charles Mackay, ed., ''The Mormons, or Latter-day Saints; with memoirs of the Life and Death of Joseph Smith, the American Mahomet'', 4th ed. (London, 1856); cited in Hubert Howe Bancroft and Alfred Bates, ''History of Utah, 1540–1886'' (San Francisco: The History Co., 1889), 151 n. 112. Concludes Bancroft: "More has been made of this correspondence than it deserves," though G. D. Smith has seen fit to continue the error.</ref> who has claimed a "so mathematical" mind that cannot decide about Joseph’s truth claims since they admit of "no mathematical solution."<ref>Joseph pursued Bennet’s mathematical analogy for several paragraphs; see {{HC|vol=6|start=75–77}}. Bennet was fond of the metaphor; in 1855 he was to privately publish ''A New Revelation to Mankind, drawn from Axioms, or self-evident truths in Nature, Mathematically demonstrated''. See {{Dialogue|author=Richard D. Poll|article=Joseph Smith and the Presidency, 1844|vol=3|num=3|date=Autumn 1968|pages=19 n. 19}}</ref>  G. D. Smith may not get the joke, but he ought to at least let us know that there is one being told.

Bennet continued by suggesting that he need not have religious convictions to support Joseph, adding slyly that "you know Mahomet had his ‘right hand man.’" Joseph’s reply that God is his right-hand man is again a riposte to Bennet and follows Joseph’s half-serious gibe that "your good wishes to go ahead, coupled with Mahomet and a right hand man, are rather more vain than virtuous. Why, sir, Cæsar had his right hand Brutus, who was his left hand assassin." Joseph here pauses, and we can almost see him grin before adding: "Not, however, applying the allusion to you."<ref name="hc6" />{{Rp|77}}

Bennet had also offered Joseph a carving of "your head on a beautiful cornelian stone, as your private seal, which will be set in gold to your order, and sent to you. It will be a gem, and just what you want. . . . The expense of this seal, set in gold, will be about $40; and [the maker] assures me that if he were not so poor a man, he would present it to you free. You can, however, accept it or not."<ref name="hc6" />{{Rp|72}}

Joseph does not let this rhetorical opportunity go by, telling Bennet that "facts, like diamonds, not only cut glass, but they are the most precious jewels on earth. . . . As to the private seal you mention, if sent to me, I shall receive it with the gratitude of a servant of God, and pray that the donor may receive a reward in the resurrection of the just."<ref name="hc6" />{{Rp|77, {{ea}}}}  Joseph’s concluding remark about the necessity of "truth—diamond-hard truth" plays on this same association with the proffered precious stone.

The key point of Bennet’s letter, after the sardonic preliminaries, was an invitation to use untruth for political gain—hence Joseph’s insistence on "diamond-hard truth." Bennet closed his letter by asking to be privately relieved of his honorary commission with the Nauvoo Legion, noting that
<blockquote>
I may yet run for a high office in your state, when you would be sure of my best services in your behalf; therefore, a known connection with you would be against our mutual interest. It can be shown that a commission in the Legion was a Herald hoax, coined for the fun of it by me, as it is not believed even now by the public. In short, I expect to be yet, through your influence, governor of the State of Illinois.<ref name="hc6" />{{Rp|72, {{ea}}}}
</blockquote>

Bennet hoped to use Joseph without embracing his religious pretensions and was bold enough to say so.<ref>{{BYUS|author=Lyndon W. Cook|article=[https://byustudies.byu.edu/showtitle.aspx?title=5374 James Arlington Bennet and the Mormons]|vol=19|num=2|date=Winter 1979|pages=247–49}}</ref>  However, Joseph was not as cynical and malleable as the Easterner hoped, for the Prophet then insisted at length on the impropriety of using "the dignity and honor I received from heaven, to boost a man into [political] power," since "the wicked and unprincipled . . . would seize the opportunity to [harden] the hearts of the nation against me for dabbling at a sly game in politics."

Joseph’s fear in relation to politics is that to support the unworthy would be to corrupt the mission he has been given. "Shall I," continued Joseph rhetorically, ". . . turn to be a Judas? Shall I, who have heard the voice of God, and communed with angels, and spake as moved by the Holy Ghost for the renewal of the everlasting covenant, and for the gathering of Israel in the last days,—shall I worm myself into a political hypocrite?" Rather, Joseph hoped that "the whole earth shall bear me witness that I, like the towering rock in the midst of the ocean, which has withstood the mighty surges of the warring waves for centuries, am impregnable, and am a faithful friend to virtue, and a fearless foe to vice."<ref name="hc6" />{{Rp|77–78}} 

It is at this point that he makes the statement quoted by G. D. Smith—a nice rhetorical summation of the word games he and Bennet were playing and a jovial but direct rejection of Bennet’s politically cynical offer—but hardly evidence of someone with a grandiose self-image.<ref>When Joseph’s personal letters are compared with this letter, one suspects a large contribution by scribe and newspaperman W. W. Phelps.</ref>

=Was Joseph Smith prone to boasting?=
Joseph Smith is reported as saying:
<blockquote>
I have more to boast of than ever any man had. I am the only man that has ever been able to keep a whole church together since the days of Adam... Neither Paul, John, Peter, nor Jesus ever did it. I boast that no man ever did such work as I. The followers of Jesus ran away from Him; but the Latter-day Saints never ran away from me yet." ({{HC|vol=6|start=408|end=409}}
</blockquote>

==Joseph's quote, if accurate, is taken out of context==
Assuming that the quote is accurate in ''History of the Church'', it is evident that Joseph's quote is taken out of context. What was Joseph's intent, and why did he use this approach?  As it turns out, he was drawing from the Bible and applying its lessons to his own situation. In the original context, Joseph was facing intense persecution by many people, including some he had previously considered to be his friends. The statement about "boasting" was supposedly made about a month before he was killed. He made it after reading {{b|2|Corinthians|11||}} to the congregation. Note the following statement by Paul, in this scripture:

==Paul: "let no one think me foolish; but if you do, receive me even as foolish, that I also may boast a little"==
Paul said:
<blockquote>
Again I say, let no one think me foolish; but if you do, receive me even as foolish, that I also may boast a little. That which I am speaking, I am not speaking it as the Lord would, but as in foolishness, in this confidence of boasting. Since many boast according to the flesh, I will boast also. For you, being so wise, bear the foolish gladly. ({{b|2|Corinthians|11|16-19}}, NASB)
</blockquote>
Paul then launches into a literary tirade where he claims many things to make himself look the fool, to contrast himself with those who the Corinthians were listening to for their words of salvation, instead of to him. His words were meant to compare and contrast what the Saints at Corinth were doing against what he was offering.

Do the critics dismiss the words of Paul and deny his calling as an Apostle because he used such a literary approach that included boasting? No, they do not. Yet, they dismiss Joseph Smith when it is clear by his own statements, in context, that he engaged in the exact same literary approach. Consider the words of Joseph right after reading this chapter of Paul's to the congregation:
<blockquote>
My object is to let you know that I am right here on the spot where I intend to stay. I, like Paul, have been in perils, and oftener than anyone in this generation. As Paul boasted, I have suffered more than Paul did, I should be like a fish out of water, if I were out of persecutions. Perhaps my brethren think it requires all this to keep me humble. The Lord has constituted me curiously that I glory in persecution. I am not nearly so humble as if I were not persecuted. If oppression will make a wise man mad, much more a fool. If they want a beardless boy to whip all the world, I will get on the top of a mountain and crow like a rooster: I shall always beat them. When facts are proved, truth and innocence will prevail at last. My enemies are no philosophers: they think that when they have my spoke under, they will keep me down; but for the fools, I will hold on and fly over them.<ref>{{HoC1|vol=6|start=408}}</ref>
</blockquote>

Joseph then makes the statements that the critics attack, in the same way that Paul made outrageous "boasts" to contrast his position with the position of those who the Corinthians were starting to listen to. Paul starts the next chapter of 2 Corinthians with the statement "boasting is necessary, though it is not profitable." So, it would appear that Paul recognizes the necessity of boasting at times against the wicked and hard-hearted (though it may do little good, being unprofitable), yet the critics do not allow Joseph to follow Paul's advice and, of necessity, boast at times.

Perhaps the critics are unaware of Paul's advice? Or perhaps they apply a double standard where Paul is allowed such literary and rhetorical license, but Joseph is not? 

Such double standards are, sadly, the stock-in-trade of sectarian anti-Mormonism.

{{Critical sources box:Joseph Smith/Narcissism/Did Joseph Smith 'boast' of keeping the Church intact/CriticalSources}}{{blankline}}

=Did Joseph Smith believe that he was better than Jesus Christ?=

{{SummaryItem
|link=#REDIRECTThe Hurlbut affidavits#What do the Hurlbut affidavits say about Joseph Smith claiming that he was "as good as Jesus Christ"?
|subject=The Hurlbut affidavits and claim that Joseph thought he was "better than Jesus Christ".
|summary=The source of this claim is the hostile Hulrbut affidavits, one of the first anti-Mormon works. Unsurprisingly, this charge is not credible.
}}

Consider the following excerpt from a letter Joseph wrote to his wife Emma:
<blockquote>
I will try to be contented with my lot, knowing that God is my friend. In him I shall find comfort. I have given my life into his hands. I am prepared to go at his call. I desire to be with Christ. I count not my life dear to me [except] to do his will.<ref>[https://www.lds.org/manual/teachings-joseph-smith/chapter-20?lang=eng Letter from Joseph Smith to Emma Smith], June 6, 1832, Greenville, Indiana; Chicago Historical Society, Chicago, Illinois.</ref>
</blockquote>
These are not the words of a man who believed himself to be better than Christ. Joseph loved Christ and throughout his life strove to follow him. These words written in private to his wife demonstrate that Joseph was not so prideful as to think himself better than Christ. Consider also the following statement, made in public, by Joseph Smith:
<blockquote>
I do not think there have been many good men on the earth since the days of Adam; but there was one good man and his name was Jesus. Many persons think a prophet must be a great deal better than anybody else....I do not want you to think that I am very righteous, for I am not.<ref>''History of the Church'' 5:401.</ref>
</blockquote>
Both in private and in public Joseph Smith demonstrated his humility before the Lord.

{{Critical sources box:Joseph Smith/Narcissism/CriticalSources}}{{blankline}}

=Did Joseph Smith say that he would be a "second Muhammad," threatening to spread his beliefs with the sword?=
==The statement which Joseph is charged with making did not accord at all with how he had his followers behave==

Some have argued that Joseph may have said something like this, but was doing so for rhetorical effect to frighten the Missourians into leaving the Saints alone.  But, it is by no means certain that he said it at all.  Some who made the claims returned to the Church, and other sources were motivated by hostility and a desire to portray the Saints as a military and religious threat.

==This claim came from Thomas B. Marsh after he left the Church==

The source of this claim is from Thomas B. Marsh, an apostate former president of the Quorum of the Twelve.  In 1838, Marsh swore an affidavit in which he claimed to have heard Joseph Smith say:

<blockquote>
he would yet tread down his enemies, and walk over their dead bodies; and if he was not let alone, he would be a second Mohammed to this generation, and that it would be one gore of blood from the Rocky Mountains to the Atlantic Ocean; that like Mohammed, whose motto in treating for peace was, 'the Alcoran or the Sword,' so should it be eventually with us, 'Joseph Smith or the Sword.' <ref>{{HC1|vol=3|start=167 note}}</ref>
</blockquote>

==Green and Goldrup: "this threat was quite probably a mere fabrication by the disgruntled Marsh"==

Arnold Green and Lawrence Goldrup noted in 1971 that "this threat was quite probably a mere fabrication by the disgruntled Marsh," <ref>{{Dialogue1|author=Arnold H. Green and Lawrence P. Goldrup|article=Joseph Smith, An American Muhammad?: An Essay on the Perils of Historical Analogy|vol=6|num=1|date=|Spring 1971|start=46}}</ref> and pointed out Orson Hyde (who was also disaffected at the time) later repented and returned, indicating that parts of the affidavit had been invented by Marsh.  Marsh himself was later to repent and return to the Church, which casts further doubt on his story.

The tale was also repeated by George M. Hinkle, John Corrill, George Walter, and partially by Abner Scovil. <ref>David Grua, "From the Archives: Joseph Smith or the Sword!?," blog post at ''Juvenile Instructor'' blog (17 Nov 2007) {{link|url=http://www.juvenileinstructor.org/from-the-archives-joseph-smith-or-the-sword/}}.</ref>  Joseph Smith's journal for the period notes:

<blockquote>
some excitement was raised in the adjoining Counties, that is Ray & Clay, against us, in consequence of the suden departure of these wicked character[s], of the apostates from this Church, into that vicinity reporting false stories, and statements, but when they [the Missourians] come to hear the other side of the question their feeling[s] were all allayed upon that subject especially. <ref>JS, Journal, [July 1838], cited in {{PJSVol2_1|start=255&ndash;256}}; as cited in ''Juvenile Instructor'', ibid.</ref>
</blockquote>

==It is, then, by no means certain that Joseph made this statement&mdash;the witnesses are all hostile, and clearly intended to frighten the Missourians==

Joseph was under enormous pressure to defend the Saints against the repeated actions of mobbers.  As historian Marvin Hill notes,

<blockquote>
the actual response to belligerence when it occurred was much more restrained. Although the elders did confiscate property and burn houses, their attacks were generally aimed at specific enemies. Mormons had neither the inclination nor means to wage a general war of extermination against all mobbers, despite menacing talk. The only fatalities occurred in the skirmish with Bogart, where the elders got the worst of the fight. Had the prophet been intent on waging total war, it is unlikely he would have allowed Rigdon to issue his 4th of July warning, which only put the Missourians on guard. <ref>{{QuestForRefuge1|start=97}}</ref>
</blockquote>

{{SummaryItem
|link=Joseph Smith's campaign for President of the United States
|subject=Did Joseph Smith run for President because he had delusions of grandeur?
|summary=Joseph Smith was sincere in his political principles, which seem to have been generally well-received and were well thought out. There is little evidence, however, that Joseph expected to win his political contest. Joseph had ample experience with persecution and hatred throughout his prophetic career; it seems unlikely that he would have expected to overcome such animus and successfully be elected president. 
}}
{{Critical sources box:Joseph Smith/Narcissism/A "second Mohammad"/CriticalSources}}{{blankline}}

<!-- PLEASE DO NOT REMOVE ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE -->
[[Category:American Massacre]]
[[Category:No Man Knows My History]]
[[Category:Questions]]
[[de:Frage: Hat Joseph Smith gesagt, dass er ein "zweiter Muhammad" sein würde, der droht, seinen Glauben mit dem Schwert zu verbreiten?]]
[[es:Pregunta: ¿José Smith dijo que él sería un "segundo Mahoma", amenazando con difundir sus creencias con la espada?]]
[[pt:Pergunta: Será que Joseph Smith dizer que ele seria um "segundo Muhammad," ameaçando espalhar suas crenças com a espada?]]



{{endnotes sources}}