View source for Criticism of Mormonism/Books/Nauvoo Polygamy/Chapter 7

{{Main Page}} 
{{H1
|L=Criticism of Mormonism/Books/Nauvoo Polygamy/Chapter 7
|H=Response to claims made in "Chapter 7"
|S=
|L1=
|T=[[../../|Nauvoo Polygamy: "... but we called it celestial marriage"]]
|A=George D. Smith
|<=[[../Chapter 6|Chapter 6]]
|>=[[../Chapter 8|Chapter 8]]
}}
<onlyinclude>
{{H2
|L=Criticism of Mormonism/Books/Nauvoo Polygamy/Chapter 7
|H=Response to claims made in Nauvoo Polygamy, "Chapter 7"
|S=
|L1=Response to claim: 416 - "the 1846 temple sealings, which re-comemorated previously conducted plural marriages, were carefully noted in Nauvoo temple records"
|L2=Response to claim: 423 - Joseph Smith is claimed to have "appropriated church members' charitable donations for real estate speculation, buying low and selling high to those immigrants who could afford to pay"
|L3=Response to claim: 429 - A friend of Nancy Rigdon, Francis had become concerned in 1842 over Smith's advances toward her"
|L4=Response to claim: 435 - Dallin H. Oaks' assertation that the "abatement of newspapers publishing scandalous or provocative material" was not considered a violation of freedom of the press at the time"
|L5=Response to claim: 438–439 - William Law's claims about Joseph mismanaging or defrauding the Lawrence estate
|L6=Response to claim: 445 - William Clayton's "discussion of plural marriage was at once turned into a charge of having had 'unlawful intercourse with women'"
|L7=Response to claim: 446 - Andrew Jenson published about plural wives, only to have Wilford Woodruff complain about him having done so
|L8=Response to claim: 449 - Latter-day Saints "accepted as sufficient" that Joseph Smith's death was "due to an angry mob, without caring to know specifically what those Illinois neighbors had been angry about"
|L9=Response to claim: 450 - "One LDS educator in 1967 wrote about the 'causes' of conflict in Nauvoo…without mentioning plural marriage"
|L10=Response to claim: 450 n. 106 - The author cites the paper as "Causes of Non-Mormon Conflict"
}}
</onlyinclude>

==Response to claim: 416 - "the 1846 temple sealings, which re-comemorated previously conducted plural marriages, were carefully noted in Nauvoo temple records"==
{{IndexClaimItemShort
|title=Nauvoo Polygamy
|claim={{AuthorQuote|"…the 1846 temple sealings, which re-comemorated previously conducted plural marriages, were carefully noted in Nauvoo temple records."}}
}}
{{information|The Church has allowed these records to be seen by researchers and even published by Signature Books. <ref>Lisle G. Brown, ''Nauvoo Sealings, Adoptions, and Anointings : A Comprehensive Register of Persons Receiving LDS Temple Ordinances'' 1841-1846 (Salt Lake City: Signature Books, 2006).</ref> This seems a strange course of action for an organization determined (as the author repeatedly insists) to "expurgating" the history of plural marriage.
}}
*[[Church history/Censorship and revision]]
*[[../../Censorship]]
*{{GLS-Nauvoo Polygamy-FARMS}}
{{CriticalWorks:Smith:Nauvoo_Polygamy:See_also:Censorship}}

==Response to claim: 423 - Joseph Smith is claimed to have "appropriated church members' charitable donations for real estate speculation, buying low and selling high to those immigrants who could afford to pay"==
{{IndexClaimItemShort
|title=Nauvoo Polygamy
|claim=In Nauvoo, Joseph is claimed to have "appropriated church members' charitable donations for real estate speculation, buying low and selling high to those immigrants who could afford to pay."	
}}
{{misinformation|Joseph had, in fact, signed a note for the land—thus going into debt himself. He sold land at variable prices, charging those who could afford more money so that he could give free or cheap land to the poor. This is not land speculation.
}}
{{:Question: Did Joseph Smith engage in "land speculation" in Nauvoo?}}
*{{GLS-Nauvoo Polygamy-FARMS}}

==Response to claim: 429 - A friend of Nancy Rigdon, Francis had become concerned in 1842 over Smith's advances toward her"==
{{IndexClaimItemShort
|title=Nauvoo Polygamy
|claim={{AuthorQuote|"A friend of Nancy Rigdon, Francis had become concerned in 1842 over Smith's advances toward her."}}
}}
{{misinformation|The author fails to tell us that Francis was, in fact, Nancy's boyfriend and her suitor.  He also neglects to mention that Francis had contracted a venereal disease from a prostitute, had been seducing women under John C. Bennett's tutelage, and may have engaged in a homosexual relationship with Bennett.
}}
*[[Polygamy book/John C. Bennett|John C. Bennett]]
{{CriticalWorks:Smith:Nauvoo_Polygamy:See_also:John_C._Bennett}}

==Response to claim: 435 - Dallin H. Oaks' assertation that the "abatement of newspapers publishing scandalous or provocative material" was not considered a violation of freedom of the press at the time"==
{{IndexClaimItemShort
|title=Nauvoo Polygamy
|claim=The author claims that Dallin H. Oaks' assertation that the "abatement of newspapers publishing scandalous or provocative material" was not considered a violation of freedom of the press at the time draws "no distinction between the destruction of a newspaper without a trial and a libel charge being tried in the courts."
|authorsources=<br>
#{{Zioncourts1|start=112-13, 390n13 (Citing Oaks)}}
}}
{{misinformation|The author's "reply" to Dallin Oaks is a ''[[Logical_fallacies#Non_sequitur|non sequitur]]''.  Oaks (and Firmage and Mangrum) demonstrate at length that both Illinois and U.S. law had ample precedent in case law and practice for the abatement of the ''Expositor''. If the author wishes to dispute the legal scholarship marshaled by Oaks' 40 page review, it deserves more than a dismissive footnote, and he ought to interact with Oaks' article, not a brief summary in a secondary source. <ref>Dallin H. Oaks, "The Suppression of the Nauvoo Expositor," ''Utah Law Review'' 9 (1965): 862–903.</ref> 
}}
*[[../../Presentism#.22Freedom_of_the_press.22]]
*[[Nauvoo Expositor]]
{{CriticalWorks:Smith:Nauvoo_Polygamy:See_also:Expositor}}	

==Response to claim: 438–439 - William Law's claims about Joseph mismanaging or defrauding the Lawrence estate==
{{IndexClaimItemShort
|title=Nauvoo Polygamy
|claim=The author follows William Law's claims about Joseph mismanaging or defrauding the Lawrence estate.
|authorsources=<br>
#Cook, ''William Law'', 120.
}}
{{misinformation|The author completely ignores the primary documents on this issue, and relies only on Law's hostile, and demonstrably false, account.
}}
{{:Question: Did Joseph Smith mismanage the estate of two orphans, Maria and Sarah Lawrence by marrying these sisters polygamously in order to use the marriage to enrich himself?}}
*{{GDS-See also|3|196}}
*{{GLS-Nauvoo Polygamy-FARMS}}	

<!-- ====442====
{{IndexClaimItemShort
|title=Nauvoo Polygamy
|claim={{AuthorQuote|"Instead of evaluating a difficult past in order not to repeat it, the church leadership tried to separate its troubles from their apparent causes."}}
}}
*[[../../Use_of_sources#.22separate_its_troubles_from_their_apparent_causes.22]]
*{{GLS-Nauvoo Polygamy-FARMS}} -->

==Response to claim: 445 - William Clayton's "discussion of plural marriage was at once turned into a charge of having had 'unlawful intercourse with women'"==
{{IndexClaimItemShort
|title=Nauvoo Polygamy
|claim=William Clayton's "discussion of plural marriage was at once turned into a charge of having had 'unlawful intercourse with women.'"
|authorsources=<br>
#Smith, ''Intimate Chronicle'', xlix-l.
{{CriticalWorks:Smith:Nauvoo_Polygamy:See_also:William Clayton}}
}}
{{misinformation|The author told us earlier only that in England Clayton "was personally suspected of ‘having had unlawful intercourse with women.’”  He said nothing about this being due only to Clayton's discussion of the matter. Even now, though, the author still does not tell us that the charge came from an “apostate Mormon,” whom Clayton claimed had maliciously distorted his words.
}}
*[[Polygamy/William Clayton]]	
*{{GLS-Nauvoo Polygamy-FARMS}}

==Response to claim: 446 - Andrew Jenson published about plural wives, only to have Wilford Woodruff complain about him having done so==
{{IndexClaimItemShort
|title=Nauvoo Polygamy
|claim=The author mentions that Andrew Jenson published about plural wives, only to have Wilford Woodruff complain about him having done so. The author has continuously argued that the Church has striven to hide or suppress knowledge of polygamy.
|authorsources=<br>
#{{CriticalWork:Van Wagoner:Mormon Polygamy|pages=135}}
}}
{{misinformation|The author does not tell us that the reason Woodruff was worried was because at the time (1887) federal marshals were pursuing and jailing polygamists and their wives who refused to testify.  Woodruff was trying to keep members out of jail, not trying to suppress polygamy.
}}
{{:Question: Did Wilford Woodruff criticize assistant Church Historian Andrew Jenson's decision to publish the names of those who were married to Joseph Smith because he wanted to hide the fact that Joseph was married to other women?}}
*{{GLS-Nauvoo Polygamy-FARMS}}

<!-- ====447====
{{IndexClaimItemShort
|title=Nauvoo Polygamy
|claim=Joseph F. Smith wrote to Orson Pratt that a “few years ago [I] tried to get affidavits regarding Joseph Smith and ‘celestial marriage.’ . . . I was astonished at the scarcity of evidence. I might say almost total absence of direct evidence upon the subject as connected with the prophet Joseph himself.”
|authorsources=<br>
#Joseph F. Smith to Orson Pratt Sr., 19 July 1875, Joseph F. Smith Letterbooks, Ms d 1325, Joseph F. Smith Collection, Church History Library and Archives.
{{CriticalWorks:Smith:Nauvoo_Polygamy:See_also:Censorship}}
}}
*If the church had scant evidence in 1875, what evidence did those compiling the ''History of the Church'' more than twenty years earlier have? This speaks directly to Smith's complaints about the ''History of the Church''.
*[[Church history/Censorship and revision]]
*[[../../Censorship]]	 -->

==Response to claim: 449 - Latter-day Saints "accepted as sufficient" that Joseph Smith's death was "due to an angry mob, without caring to know specifically what those Illinois neighbors had been angry about"==
{{IndexClaimItemShort
|title=Nauvoo Polygamy
|claim=The author implies that Latter-day Saints "accepted as sufficient" that Joseph Smith's death was "due to an angry mob, without caring to know specifically what those Illinois neighbors had been angry about."	
|authorsources=<br>
#The author lists these works but does not give page numbers.
#Brigham H. Roberts, ''A Comprehensive History of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints'' (Provo, UT: BYU Press, 1965).
#Joseph Fielding Smith, ''Essentials in Church History: A History of the Church from the Birth of Joseph Smith to the Present Time (1922), with Introductory Chapters on the Antiquity of the Gospel and The “Falling Away”'' (Salt Lake City: Deseret News Press, 1922).
#William E. Berrett, ''The Restored Church: A Brief History of the Origin, Growth and Doctrines of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints'' (Salt Lake City: Department of Education of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints and Deseret Book, 1958).
#Orson F. Whitney, ''Life of Heber C. Kimball, An Apostle; The Father and Founder of the British Mission'' (Salt Lake City: Kimball family, 1888).
#Leonard J. Arrington and Davis Bitton, ''The Mormon Experience: A History of the Latter-Day Saints'', 2nd ed. (New York: Knopf, 1992).
{{CriticalWorks:Smith:Nauvoo_Polygamy:See_also:Censorship}}  
}}
{{misinformation|{{HistoricalError}} The author cites five works for this claim. All five, contrary to his claim, discuss the role of plural marriage in Joseph Smith's martyrdom, as well as other facts.
}}
{{:Question: Do Mormon histories have a long history of omitting mention of plural marriage as a cause for the Saints' troubles in Illinois?}}
*[[../../Censorship]]
*{{GLS-Nauvoo Polygamy-FARMS}}

==Response to claim: 450 - "One LDS educator in 1967 wrote about the 'causes' of conflict in Nauvoo…without mentioning plural marriage"==
{{IndexClaimItemShort
|title=Nauvoo Polygamy
|claim=The author notes that "[o]ne LDS educator in 1967 wrote about the 'causes' of conflict in Nauvoo…without mentioning plural marriage."	
|authorsources=<br>
#Kenneth W. Godfrey, “Causes of [Mormon ''sic''] Non-Mormon Conflict in Hancock County, Illinois, 1839–1846” (PhD diss., Brigham Young University, 1967), chap 7.
{{CriticalWorks:Smith:Nauvoo_Polygamy:See_also:Censorship}}
}}
{{misinformation|Contrary to the author's claim, Godfrey's cited chapter is entitled "plural marriage," and he discusses it at length there and in his abstract and conclusion.
}}
*[[Church history/Censorship and revision/LDS histories over many years omit plural marriage|LDS histories over many years omit plural marriage#Godfrey]]
*[[../../Censorship]]
*{{GLS-Nauvoo Polygamy-FARMS}}
*{{AuthorPublisherResponse}} The publisher acknowledged that the author "might have been more precise" in his statement, and indicated that the author meant that Latter-day Saints "have yet to acknowledge" that polygamy was a "main cause" leading to Joseph Smith's death. {{link|url=http://www.signaturebooks.com/pluralmarriage.htm?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1234200952&sr=1-1}}

==Response to claim: 450 n. 106 - The author cites the paper as "Causes of Non-Mormon Conflict"==
{{IndexClaimItemShort
|title=Nauvoo Polygamy
|claim=The author cites the paper as "Causes of Non-Mormon Conflict…."
|authorsources=<br>
#{{CitationError}} Correct title is: "Causes of '''Mormon''' Non-Mormon Conflict…" {{ea}}	
}}
{{misinformation}}

{{endnotes sources}}