by John Gee
Many years ago, a friend reported to me on a mutual friend’s conversation with his bishop. Our mutual friend wanted to ordain his twelve-year-old son to the Aaronic Priesthood. The bishop said to him: You do not believe that angelic messengers appeared to Joseph Smith. What exactly do you think you will be conferring on your son?
I never heard what his answer was, but I have long thought about the question.
The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints is a covenant organization. It consists of those who have made at least one specific covenant with God: baptism. This covenant is an agreement between God and an individual whose terms are dictated by God and it is administered by those specifically authorized by God to represent him. Both parties of the covenant need to participate in the covenant for it to be binding. God is party through his representative or agent who administers the covenant on his behalf; they are “agents . . . on the Lord’s errand” (Doctrine and Covenants 64:29). We act as agents on our own behalf, or agents unto ourselves (Doctrine and Covenants 29:35, 39; 58:28; 104:17).
Not just anyone can represent God. God needs to designate them and recognize them. Thus, in the Church, “we believe that a man must be called of God, by prophecy, and by the laying on of hands by those who are in authority, to preach the Gospel and administer in the ordinances thereof” (Article of Faith 5). God must determine and designate who receives his authority. We might want to have a particular individual receive that authority, but God is the one who decides. That decision is communicated by revelation to those who are in authority.
When God no longer recognized anyone on earth as his authorized representative who could administer his covenants with his children, he provided a way for that authority to be restored to earth. This required sending an angel with the authority, to authorize mortals to represent God. This is the background to Doctrine and Covenants 13, when a resurrected John the Baptist appeared as an angel to Joseph Smith and Oliver Cowdery, laid his hands on their heads and said: “Upon you my fellow servants, in the name of Messiah, I confer the Priesthood of Aaron, which holds the keys of the ministering of angels, and of the gospel of repentance, and of baptism by immersion for the remission of sins” (Doctrine and Covenants 13:1). John the Baptist gave Joseph Smith and Oliver Cowdery the authority to administer certain ordinances and covenants. Other authority came with later angelic visitations.
Joseph Smith was clear on the importance of having the proper authority. In the earliest (1832) draft of his history he noted the two priesthoods that he had received from angels. Among the reasons that he gave for writing the document were “thirdly, the reception of the holy Priesthood by the ministering of Angels to administer the letter of the Gospel—the law and commandments as they were given unto him—and the ordinances; fourthly, a confirmation and reception of the high Priesthood after the holy order of the Son of the living God, power and ordinance from on high to preach the Gospel in the administration and demonstration of the Spirit, the keys of the Kingdom of God conferred upon him and the continuation of the blessings of God to him.” (Joseph Smith Papers, Histories 1:10, spelling, capitalization, and punctuation normalized.) That authority has continued in unbroken succession to the present.
The Book of Mormon usually refers to what we call the priesthood as “the power and authority of God” (Mosiah 13:6; 18:17, 26; 27:14; Alma 5:3; 17:3; Helaman 11:18; 3 Nephi 7:17; 12:1; Moroni 8:28). It is his authority because he controls it and it allows individuals to act in his name in administering covenants. The power that accompanies that authority comes as those who are authorized do the will of God which they learn through revelation.
When individuals have difficulties with the way God administers his priesthood, perhaps they need to ask themselves the question my friend was asked: What exactly do you think the Priesthood is?
If the priesthood is the authority to act for God in making covenants, then should God not have a say in who represents him? Those who wish to dictate who should be given that authority are either claiming that (1) they either know better than God, (2) that their moral judgment is superior to God’s, (3) or that there is no authority from God to be transmitted. If there either is no authority from God or God did not transmit that authority, then there is no point in entering into an unauthorized covenant with God because there is no way of knowing that God will recognize an unauthorized covenant. After all, God has said, “I, the Lord, am bound when ye do what I say; but when ye do not what I say, ye have no promise” (Doctrine and Covenants 82:10). (The logic is sound even if one does not believe that God was talking.) God is bound only when we do what he says. We do not get to make our own covenants, nor do we have any guarantees if we do not keep them. Nor are there any guarantees if we try to enter into them outside the channels that God has authorized.
If God sent angels to Joseph Smith to give him divine power and authority, then there is no point in quibbling about how God has chosen to administer that authority. If he did not, then there is nothing to quibble about.
Since I, unlike my friend, believe that God did send angels, then I am willing to let God set the terms and conditions for how his authority is used and to whom he gives it.
More Come Follow Me resources here.
John Gee is the William (Bill) Gay Research Professor in the Department of Asian and Near Eastern Languages at Brigham Young University. He has authored over one-hundred and fifty publications including three books and editor of eight books and has edited a peer-reviewed international professional journal. He has served on the board of trustees of national and international organizations.
Varuzhan says
This is about the next week topic, but I wonder if you can help clarify these two stories:
David wanted to go to Harmony immediately, but his father reminded him that he had two days of heavy work to do before he could leave. It was planting season, and David needed to plow twenty acres and enrich the soil with plaster of paris to help their wheat grow. His father said he ought to pray first to learn if it was absolutely necessary to leave now.
David took his father’s advice, and as he prayed, he felt the Spirit tell him to finish his work at home before going to Harmony.
The next morning, David walked out to the fields and saw rows of dark furrows in ground that had been unplowed the evening before. Exploring the fields further, he saw that about six acres had been plowed overnight, and the plow was waiting for him in the last furrow, ready for him to finish the job.
David’s father was astonished when he learned what had happened. “There must be an overruling hand in this,” he said, “and I think you had better go down to Pennsylvania as soon as your plaster of paris is sown.”
David worked hard to plow the remaining fields and prepare the soil for a successful planting. When he finished, he hitched his wagon to a strong team of horses and set out for Harmony earlier than expected.
7 Fellow Servants
Saints, Volume 1
Restoration and Church History
There are two different versions of what happened in the filed and where David received the divine help with.
Varuzhan says
It looks like I did not include the second version:
“David went to the field, and found that he had two heavy days’ work before him. … He then fastened his horses to the harrow, and instead of dividing the field into what is, by farmers, usually termed lands, drove around the whole of it, continuing thus till noon, when, on stopping for dinner, he looked around, and discovered to his surprise, that he had harrowed in full half the wheat. After dinner he went on as before, and by evening he finished the whole two days’ work.
“His father, on going into the field the same evening, saw what had been done, and he exclaimed, ‘There must be an overruling hand in this, and I think you would better go down to Pennsylvania as soon as your plaster of paris is sown.’
Lesson 20: Doctrine and Covenants 14–16
Doctrine and Covenants and Church History Seminary Teacher Manual
Seminary
https://www.churchofjesuschrist.org/study/manual/doctrine-and-covenants-and-church-history-seminary-teacher-manual-2014/section-0/lesson-20?lang=eng&verse=#p
David Smith says
Varuzhan,
On your question about different stories regarding David Whitmer, the second version is a quote from Lucy Mack Smith, and the first version is a summary from Lucy Mack Smith’s quote and a quote by David Whitmer. Although the two quotes differ in some details, they overall convey that David had divine help in accomplishing the work.
I recommending reading the original quotes to learn more:
Lucy Mack Smith quote: https://www.josephsmithpapers.org/paper-summary/lucy-mack-smith-history-1844-1845/100
David Whitmer quote: https://catalog.churchofjesuschrist.org/assets/dca15baa-a0ac-4fc1-b2ec-7f3cd75e4906/0/43#churchofjesuschrist